Goodwood South closer to becoming Clarence Park

As debate on Council’s preferred position on the Representation Review stalled at last night’s council meeting we did agree on proposing a name change of the one ward that does not have a name that is easily identifiable with the suburbs it covers.

As I noted in my last post we are legally bound to conduct a “representation review” every 8 years or so.

After a first round of public consultation resulting in one (yes one) response we sat done last night to prepare and decide on our preferred position before going back out for a second round of public consultation.

We agreed on the following:

1  That there be no change to the name of the city. Unley it was, Unley it is and Unley it is to stay. as far as we are concerned.

2   That the  Mayor still be elected by the people rather than appointed by the elected members.

3   The there be no area councillors in addition to the ward councillors.

4   That we will retain a 6 ward structure, rather than abolish wards altogether, and in lieu of changing to 3 wards as suggested by Parkside Councillor, John Koumi.

5   That we retain 12 elected members plus the Mayor.

What we could not agree on (actually we came close I believe) was where the ward boundaries should be in order to keep the rate payer to elected member ratio to within a 10% variance. We probably have the answer but we need to run the numbers on the suggestions made last night to confirm we are within the 10% or not, before endorsing it.

Once we do that, which will now be at next months Council meeting, we can go out to the public for your comments should you have any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *